Wednesday, October 22, 2008

ESPN-Gate: Jay Glazer ticked over ESPN memo

The release of the ESPN memo, telling their folks not to report what Jay Glazer was reporting over at Fox, has Glazer ticked with the network. The ESPN memo had the headline: "DO NOT REPORT . . . DO NOT REPORT . . . . DO NOT REPORT . . . DO NOT REPORT.” Pro Football Talk reports (under the headline "GLAZER GOES ON THE WARPATH"):
    Among other things, Glazer called ESPN’s attempt to question the accuracy of his story “kind of garbage,” and he said that he has no problem putting his record against ESPN’s.

    “Don’t make it personal with me,” Glazer said. “I’ll make it personal with you.”

    For starters, Glazer suggested that a score sheet should be kept between his reports and those from ESPN.

    “I’ve got no problem going record for record,” Glazer said. “In fact I’d like to do that.”
This Glazer vs. ESPN story (with Peter King tossed in for good measure) is better than the Favre-Lions debacle.

3 comments:

admin said...

Fairly great write-up. I simply Digging your website and desired to say that I’ve actually loved studying your blogpost. Any way I’ll be signing up to your feed and I think you’ll publish as soon as extra within the close to future.
blemish treatment

Allen Smith said...

Thanks rather a lot for display slightly beneficial informations. Your web site is great.I'm impressed by the data that you have on this blog. It exhibits how very nicely you understand this subject. Bookmarked this course of web web page, will arrive back once more for lots more. You, my buddy, wonderful! I found just the data I previously seemed for in every single place and simply couldn't come across. What a superb web site. Just like this internet site your website is one in every of my new favorite.I akin to this info proven and it has given me some sort of motivation to have accomplishment for some cause, so preserve up the beneficial work!
head lice treatment

Unknown said...

I don't know why networks are doing that kind of thing. News are for everybody and they should cover all of them. Some people on pay per head services are tick off about it too.